{
  "kind": "register/kill-ledger",
  "source": "src/config/kill-ledger.ts — transcribed from the engine registry at Rev 3.1",
  "published": "2026-08-30",
  "registry": {
    "denominator": 19,
    "killed": 4,
    "rejected_at_registration": 4,
    "blocked_on_data": 2,
    "standing": 9
  },
  "entries": [
    {
      "date": "2026-06-24",
      "what": "S-001 — salience-zone retrodiction: do high-salience levels pre-mark the origination points of range-expansion days?",
      "registration": "S-001 · registered pre-data; this run was the corpus’s first data contact, which closed the registry’s amendment window permanently",
      "recordedIn": "accumulated-null-ledger.md row 11 — the registry seed still reads Status: REGISTERED for S-001",
      "why": "Origination-level salience enrichment −0.042, 95% CI [−0.127, +0.042] — spans zero. The salience score failed its first retrodictive exam, by its own registered kill criterion.",
      "replacedBy": "Nothing. The score’s prior weakened and the hypotheses that depend on it inherit that, reported rather than buried."
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-06-24",
      "what": "H-010 — HADEYS: do ADR-normalised liquidation-footprint zones predict behaviour on future revisits?",
      "registration": "H-010 · ◆ primary endpoint frozen at registration; evaluated against matched point-in-time control cohorts, walk-forward",
      "recordedIn": "accumulated-null-ledger.md row 10 — the registry seed still reads Status: REGISTERED for H-010",
      "why": "Revisit effect −63.5 raw price units vs matched controls, 95% CI [−146.40, +17.92] — spans zero across 3 event-count folds, at q = 0.05 against a registry denominator of 18.",
      "replacedBy": "H-012, a tighter-footprint variant — registered as a NEW entry (raising the denominator to 19) rather than by widening the dead one. H-012 died too, and carries its own entry in this ledger."
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-06-29",
      "what": "H-011 — ACTIVE_DISLOCATION: wide spread with elevated quote rate at a breach as the signature of a structural liquidation trap",
      "registration": "H-011 · registered 2026-06-23 with ◆ designated; killed six days later by the pre-registered coherence machinery",
      "recordedIn": "hypothesis-registry-seed.md — Status: KILLED (2026-06-29 forensic audit), Rev 3.0",
      "why": "Failed the cluster-coherence filter: 7 of 12 adjacent parameter cells shared the primary’s sign and magnitude, against a required 8. Conditional trap intensity decayed monotonically (+0.83 → +0.27) as parameters tightened — the fingerprint of generic range-bound mean-reversion, not a structural trap. Killed on the conservative reading of single-pair evidence, which is the direction that only ever removes a thesis.",
      "replacedBy": "Nothing. A successor may enter only as a new registered entry; the frozen sibling hypothesis stands registered and untested."
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-07-23",
      "what": "H-012 — HADEYS tighter footprint: shallower penetration with stronger reversal as a higher-confidence liquidation fingerprint",
      "registration": "H-012 · registered post-H-010 as a new entry; evaluated only on clean pairs — the EUR, GBP, CAD and CHF crosses were excluded as burned",
      "recordedIn": "hypothesis-registry-seed.md — Status: KILLED (2026-07-23), Rev 3.1",
      "why": "The confidence interval spans zero on every clean pair evaluated — six of six (e.g. AUDUSD −2.5 [−92.5, +86.3]; NZDUSD +12.3 [−89.4, +114.7]). Tightening the footprint did not produce an edge.",
      "replacedBy": "Nothing."
    }
  ]
}